When anyone has the power to destroy the whole human race in a matter of hours, it becomes a moral issue. The church must speak out.

If there is no objective morality then love is no better than murder.

It is not a man's duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even to most enormous wrong; he may still properly have other concerns to engage him; but it is his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and, if he gives it no thought longer, not to give it practically his support.

Can we go too fast in saving souls? If anyone still wants a reply, let him ask the lost souls in Hell.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

We're all complicit in the things we may be trying to oppose. I'm complicit in the things that I'm trying to oppose.

I was with the U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali on the day that Srebrenica fell, which happened to be a huge historical turning point in the Bosnian war.

There are historic situations in which refusal to defend the inheritance of a civilization, however imperfect, against tyranny and aggression may result in consequences even worse than war.

Today, we save lives.

Colt wasn't the only brave one here. Wasn't the only one who was ready to do violence to keep people safe.

When you think of the sort of things that happen when a genocide happens, it's again not people who are intrinsically evil.

Murdering the innocent to advance an ideology is wrong every time everywhere