I like to recede away from classifications. You might say that indicates a fundamental lack of commitment. I suppose that's true to some degree.

How often I have found that we grow to maturity not by doing what we like, but by doing what we should. How true it is that not every 'should' is a compulsion, and not every 'like' is a high morality and true freedom.

I don't trust liberals, I trust conservatives.

People make suggestions on what to say all the time. I'll give you an example; I don't read what's handed to me. People say, 'Here, here's your speech, or here's an idea for a speech.' They're changed. Trust me.

There's as much crookedness as you want to find. There was something Abraham Lincoln said - he'd rather trust and be disappointed than distrust and be miserable all the time. Maybe I trusted too much.

Trust is very hard if you don't know what you're trusting.

When you don't trust people all of the sudden you stop trusting anything.

For me, it's just staying myself, trusting the process, trusting the game, just going through my reads at the end of the day.

Poor human reason, when it trusts in itself, substitutes the strangest absurdities for the highest divine concepts.

Exactitude is not truth.

The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.

The true and the approximately true are apprehended by the same faculty; it may also be noted that men have a sufficient natural instinct for what is true, and usually do arrive at the truth. Hence the man who makes a good guess at truth is likely to make a good guess at probabilities.